CO129-096 - Others - 1863 — Page 332

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

Here is the revised output in HTML format with minor corrections and adjustments according to the given rules:

I understand it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

However, to fully follow the format requested:

I understand it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

becomes

I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

Let me re-edit with more precise correction.

I think it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed...

Revised to fit the exact rule and original text closely:

I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to tay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a Jule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Soverner of Houghing about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be told by the trave Department but be handed bo

Let me make the final adjustment.

I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

The final output is:

I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo

Edit History

2026-05-19 04:20:13 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo Here is the revised output in HTML format with minor corrections and adjustments according to the given rules: I understand it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo However, to fully follow the format requested: I understand it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo becomes I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo Let me re-edit with more precise correction. I think it would be fair that such portion of the premium realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its merits. And a rule can be laid down other than that prescribed in a Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes is no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed... Revised to fit the exact rule and original text closely: I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to tay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a Jule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Soverner of Houghing about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be told by the trave Department but be handed bo Let me make the final adjustment. I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo The final output is: I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. It would however be impossible to lay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and a rule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Governor of Hong Kong about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be sold by the Military Department but be handed bo
Baseline (Original)
I unpiraments I think it would be bef fair that such portion of the preminen realized may be considered to be due to Imperial improvements should be handed to the Imperial Government. would however be impossible to tay down any general rule for the settlement of such cases: Each must be dealt with upon its Merits. and Его butter A Jule can be laid down 326 than that prescribed in & Dispatch from the Secretary of State to the Soverner of Houghing about 1832 (Justably that referred to by M. Sancer) which directed that when land received for Military purposes lous no longer required it should not be told by the trave Department but be handed bo
2026-05-19 04:20:13 · Baseline
View content

I

unpiraments I think it

would be

bef

fair that

such portion of the

preminen realized

may

be considered to be due

to Imperial improvements should be handed

to the Imperial Government.

would however be

impossible to tay

down

any general rule for the

settlement of

such cases:

Each must be dealt

with upon its

Merits. and

Его

butter

A

Jule can

be laid down

326

than that prescribed in

& Dispatch from the

Secretary of State to the Soverner of Houghing about

1832

(Justably that referred to by M. Sancer)

which directed that when land received for

Military purposes

lous

no longer required it should not be told

by the trave Department

but be handed

bo

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.